rsmith added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/TemplateBase.cpp:90
+ } else if (T->isWideCharType())
+ Out << "L'" << reinterpret_cast<wchar_t*>(Val.getLimitedValue(WCHAR_MAX))
+ << "'";
----------------
`getLimitedValue` doesn't return a pointer, and the host `WCHAR_MAX` has no
bearing on how target literals should be printed. Please take a look at
`StmtPrinter::VisitCharacterLiteral` and see if you can factor out a helper
function that can be shared between that and this. (Maybe as a static member of
`CharacterLiteral`?)
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/TemplateBase.cpp:98
+ } else if (T->isChar16Type())
+ Out << "u'" << Val << "'";
+ else if (T->isChar32Type())
----------------
This is still printing the numeric value of the character rather than the
character itself.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/AST/TemplateBase.cpp:101
+ Out << "U'"
+ << reinterpret_cast<char32_t*>(Val.getLimitedValue(UINT_LEAST32_MAX))
+ << "'";
----------------
Like in the above case, this cast doesn't make sense.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CXX/lex/lex.literal/lex.ext/p12.cpp:21
int f = UR"("ัะตัั ๐)"_x;
-int g = UR"("ัะตัั_๐)"_x; // expected-note {{in instantiation of function
template specialization 'operator""_x<char32_t, 34, 1090, 1077, 1089, 1090, 95,
65536>' requested here}}
+int g = UR"("ัะตัั_๐)"_x; // expected-note {{in instantiation of function
template specialization 'operator""_x<char32_t, (char32_t)34, (char32_t)1090,
(char32_t)1077, (char32_t)1089, (char32_t)1090, (char32_t)95, (char32_t)65536>'
requested here}}
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> rsmith wrote:
> > It would be useful to generate `u8'...'`, `u16'...'`, and `u32'...'`
> > literals at least whenever we think they'd contain printable characters.
> Note the sample output here is wrong. We should ideally print
>
> ```
> operator""_x<char32_t, U'\"', U'ั', U'ะต', U'ั', U'ั', U'_', U'๐">
> ```
>
> (with or without the `\` before the `"`), but if we don't have a good way to
> figure out which characters are printable, printing
>
> ```
> operator""_x<char32_t, U'\"', U'\u0442', U'\u0435', U'\u0441', U'\u0442',
> U'_', U'\U00010000">
> ```
>
> would be an acceptable fallback. You should check if LLVM already has some
> way to determine if a given Unicode character is printable and use it if
> available. I think the diagnostics infrastructure may use something like this
> already.
This output is still wrong.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77598
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
