oToToT abandoned this revision.
oToToT added a comment.
Since, originally, I think it is OK to submit patch just by project, but I
agree that it's better to make patch as minimal as possible.
Thus, I will abandon this and resubmit another patch.
(I think reuploading patch and changing the whole patch logic here might not be
great?)
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Frontend/PrecompiledPreamble.cpp:368
// Create the target instance.
- Clang->setTarget(TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo(
- Clang->getDiagnostics(), Clang->getInvocation().TargetOpts));
- if (!Clang->hasTarget())
+ if (!Clang->createTarget())
return BuildPreambleError::CouldntCreateTargetInfo;
----------------
sammccall wrote:
> oToToT wrote:
> > Changing this without other further patch might cause `clangd` results in
> > Runtime Error while handling files like CUDA.
> > Should I also include the patch of `clangd` or other related projects into
> > this patch?
> What kind of runtime error can this result in and why? What's the current
> behavior?
>
> My guess is if this has to be consistent between preamble + main AST, then
> you should change PrecompiledPreamble, ASTUnit, and clangd together in one
> patch and leave others.
Yes, this is because the inconsistency between preamble and main AST. I will
reorder my patch.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97561/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97561
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
