jsji added a comment. > Our practice has been for a "tuning" option to, effectively, expand into > other options to control various bits of behavior. Basically, there should > never be behavior that can be controlled _only_ via the tuning option. This > is a design decision that was debated at length when we introduced tuning.
Agree, this is a good practise, we will certainly follow. > I believe Sony is only using v4/v5 at this point. Regarding dialect > controlling debugger behavior, I think it's unlikely, as distinguishing C++ > dialects is new in v5, its adoption is pretty recent (at least for us), and > we'd want behavior to be consistent across v4/v5 as much as possible. I'll > verify that with our debugger guys. Thank you Paul! > If LLDB actually does _not_ have behavior change based on dialect, then we > might as well control language codes based on DWARF version, and the patch > should proceed. We will wait for LLDB's confirmation then. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
