bsmith added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20089#425541, @rengolin wrote:
> http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150824/296862.html > > One option is to add the duplication, solve all the platform problems first, > then move to a class based design. > > Another is to go directly to a class based design, but that would mean a much > bigger move. > > I'm ok with either, but I'd prefer a slow and steady change stream. I think that made sense when we only had ARM using this, but not so much now since we essentially have two implementations of the same thing. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D20089 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
