urnathan marked 5 inline comments as done.
urnathan added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:12370
     // If we weren't able to compute a valid scope, it might validly be a
     // dependent class scope or a dependent enumeration unscoped scope. If
     // we have a 'typename' keyword, the scope must resolve to a class type.
----------------
bruno wrote:
> Does this comment needs update?
I don't think so. 'if we weren't able to compute a scope' is never true for the 
using-enum case (and neither is 'if we have a typename keyword'.  what is it 
that you're finding confusing here?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D100276/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D100276

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to