urnathan marked 5 inline comments as done. urnathan added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp:12370 // If we weren't able to compute a valid scope, it might validly be a // dependent class scope or a dependent enumeration unscoped scope. If // we have a 'typename' keyword, the scope must resolve to a class type. ---------------- bruno wrote: > Does this comment needs update? I don't think so. 'if we weren't able to compute a scope' is never true for the using-enum case (and neither is 'if we have a typename keyword'. what is it that you're finding confusing here? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100276/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100276 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits