aaron.ballman added a reviewer: rsmith. aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/docs/SanitizerCoverage.rst:319 It is possible to disable coverage instrumentation for select functions via the -function attribute ``__attribute__((no_sanitize("coverage")))``. +function attribute ``__attribute__((no_sanitize("coverage")))``. Since this +attribute may not be supported by other compilers, it is recommended to use it ---------------- ================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/Features.def:52 LangOpts.Sanitize.hasOneOf(SanitizerKind::Undefined)) +FEATURE(coverage_sanitizer, LangOpts.SanitizeCoverage) FEATURE(assume_nonnull, true) ---------------- I think this is likely fine, but wanted to call it out explicitly in case others had opinions. `FEATURE` is supposed to be used for standard features and `EXTENSION` used for Clang extensions. This is an extension, not a standard feature, so it's wrong in that way. However, it's following the same pattern as the other sanitizers which is consistent. I think consistently wrong is better than inconsistently right for this case, but I have no idea how others feel. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103159/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103159 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits