vsavchenko added a comment. In D104439#2832984 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D104439#2832984>, @Szelethus wrote:
> Ping. > > The main question with this patch really is whether we want TableGen at all > or not, as for what we generate precisely and how we'd utilize it is a > discussion for later. I don't really have strong opinions here. On one hand, I'd prefer TableGen to a purely macro-based solution. On the other hand, something, let's say, C++-native (like `cl::opt`) seems better than TableGen. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104439/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104439 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
