ldionne added a comment. In D102507#2830688 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D102507#2830688>, @yaxunl wrote:
> In D102507#2792087 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D102507#2792087>, @rsmith wrote: > >> @ldionne How should we go about establishing whether libc++ would be >> prepared to officially support CUDA? Right now, Clang's CUDA support is >> patching in attributes onto libc++ functions from the outside, which doesn't >> seem like a sustainable model. > > ping If the current approach is to patch libc++ from the outside, then yeah, that's most definitely not a great design IMO. It's going to be very brittle. I think it *may* be reasonable to support this in libc++, but I'd like to see some sort of basic explanation of what the changes would be so we can have a discussion and make our mind up about whether we can support this, and what's the best way of doing it. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D102507/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D102507 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
