vsavchenko added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/RangeConstraintManager.cpp:1400
+ if (ResultType.isUnsigned()) {
+ LHS.From().uadd_ov(RHS.From(), HasMinOverflowed);
+ LHS.To().uadd_ov(RHS.To(), HasMaxOverflowed);
----------------
manas wrote:
> vsavchenko wrote:
> > manas wrote:
> > > Using `uadd_ov` (and `sadd_ov`), we can get the added value as well as
> > > whether overflow occurred or not. A point is that these functions return
> > > `APInt` instead of `APSInt`.
> > >
> > > But when I tried just using:
> > > Min = LHS.From().uadd_ov(RHS.From(), HasMinOverflowed);
> > > Max = LHS.To().uadd_ov(RHS.From(), HasMaxOverflowed);
> > >
> > > instead of
> > > Min = LHS.From() + RHS.From();
> > > Max = LHS.To() + RHS.To();
> > >
> > > just for the added value, then the following tests failed (//these tests
> > > and all other tests pass when I use the latter method to get Min/Max//):
> > >
> > > Clang :: Analysis/PR3991.m
> > > Clang :: Analysis/global-region-invalidation.c
> > > Clang :: Analysis/malloc-overflow2.c
> > > Clang :: Analysis/out-of-bounds-new.cpp
> > > Clang :: Analysis/taint-generic.c
> > >
> > > I am working on fixing this part.
> > You can easily construct `APSInt` from `APInt` using `APSInt ::APSInt(APInt
> > I, bool isUnsigned)` constructor.
> Okay. I will try with using `uadd_ov` only then. And check whether those
> tests pass or not.
Hmm, why only `uadd_ov`? What about those tests? How do they fail? Try to
look at the reasons and not brute-force by trying different solutions blindly.
Those tests are your friends, it's much better to get failures right now then
getting them later when you land the patch.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103440/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103440
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
