dim added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/tools/clang-shlib/CMakeLists.txt:5 +set(LLVM_ABI_REVISION 0) + # Building libclang-cpp.so fails if LLVM_ENABLE_PIC=Off ---------------- Is this actually needed? This CMakeLists.txt calls `add_clang_library()` in `clang/cmake/modules/AddClang.cmake`, which calls `add_llvm_library()` in `llvm/cmake/modules/AddLLVM.cmake`, which calls the confusingly named `llvm_add_library()` in the same file. That last function is already updated below to set `LLVM_ABI_REVISION` to 0 is it is unset. ================ Comment at: llvm/tools/llvm-shlib/CMakeLists.txt:9 +set(LLVM_ABI_REVISION 0) + set(SOURCES ---------------- Similar here, this CMakeLists.txt calls `add_llvm_library` which already sets the `LLVM_ABI_REVISION` to 0. ================ Comment at: llvm/tools/llvm-shlib/CMakeLists.txt:78 + PROPERTIES + SOVERSION ${LLVM_ABI_REVISION}) endif() ---------------- I think this is also handled via `add_llvm_library`/`llvm_add_library`? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105594/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105594 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits