cjdb added a comment.

In D107294#2920355 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107294#2920355>, @aaron.ballman 
wrote:

> The usual community viewpoint on off-by-default diagnostics is that they're 
> generally low value and not something that users will manually enable.

I was under the impression many warnings weren't enabled by default?

> I think this functionality is better handled by clang-tidy

Ack. I've not touched clang-tidy yet; how different do you expect the code to 
look to what I've got right now?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D107294/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D107294

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to