cjdb added a comment. In D107292#2923003 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107292#2923003>, @rsmith wrote:
> We should also warn on: > > - `and` or `bitand` used as a ref-qualifier in a member function declaration > - `xor` used to declare a block pointer type or block pointer literal > - `bitand` used as address-of and `and` used to form a GNU address-of-label > - `compl` used to name a destructor > > Of these, I think it's somewhat important to handle ref-qualifiers and > probably block pointer types at around the same time that this patch lands > (though it doesn't need to be part of this patch) for consistency among "type > operators". I'm happy to work on these patches too. I think this patch should concern itself with declarators, and a second patch should be for expressions. This does drastically expand the scope of the warning, so we should probably come up with a new name for it. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D107292/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D107292 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
