aaron.ballman added a comment.

In D108893#2999681 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108893#2999681>, @Eugene.Zelenko 
wrote:

> In D108893#2999654 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108893#2999654>, @aaron.ballman 
> wrote:
>
>> In D108893#2999645 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108893#2999645>, 
>> @Eugene.Zelenko wrote:
>>
>>> What about adding `modernize`/`bugprone` aliases?
>>
>> I'd be fine if we wanted to add aliases, but I'd sort of expect some extra 
>> functionality out of a check in those modules. I think it's fine to land 
>> this now, and we can add aliases in a follow-up. WDYT?
>
> Aliases code is trivial comparing with check itself, so it make sense to add 
> it in this patch.

So you'd like to see that extra functionality added now? (I don't think it 
makes sense to have the check as-is in both `readability` and `modernize`.)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D108893/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D108893

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to