jsji added a comment. In D110422#3025133 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110422#3025133>, @MaskRay wrote:
> The description isn't clear why the previous `weak` symbol usage does not > work. Have you verified that it does not work? Yes, we started with the `weak` symbols for `profc`/`profd` first, and tested it. We met problems, and we spent time investigate why they are not working. I have update the description to include most of the details. Let me know if it is still unclear. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110422/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110422 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
