xazax.hun added a comment. In D112646#3092619 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112646#3092619>, @whisperity wrote:
> @xazax.hun I think you did something similar wrt. `empty()`, right? Could you > take a look at this? The idea looks good to me. The module also sounds right. If we want to follow container-size-empty's convention, we should include the replaced method in the name. But I am not insisting on anything. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112646/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112646 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
