aaron.ballman added a comment. In D112491#3107361 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491#3107361>, @fowles wrote:
> Do we also want a `forEachCapture` matcher? That might be good follow-on work (I wouldn't insist on it for this patch though). ================ Comment at: clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst:223-229 +- ``LambdaCapture`` AST Matchers are now available. These matchers allow for + the binding of ``LambdaCapture`` nodes, and include the ``lambdaCapture``, + ``capturesVar``, and ``capturesThis`` matchers. In addition, the + ``hasAnyCapture`` matcher has been updated to accept an inner matcher of + type ``Matcher<LambdaCapture>`` - its original interface accepted an inner + matcher of type ``Matcher<CXXThisExpr>`` or ``Matcher<VarDecl>``, but did + not allow for the binding of ``LambdaCapture`` nodes. ---------------- We should have an additional note about the removal of the old matchers. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112491 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
