xazax.hun added a comment. It is great to model more widely used functions! However I think the LibraryFunctionsChecker name might be a bit to broad, wouldn't something like StdCLibraryFunctions be more informative?
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20811 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
