aaronpuchert added a comment. In D111264#3115104 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D111264#3115104>, @gribozavr2 wrote:
> I feel uneasy about claiming that variable decls of function type are > FunctionKind for the purposes of comment parsing (even doing it for typedefs > is questionable). It seems like a better way would be to make "is function > like" an extra dimension that can be combined with any decl kind. Agreed, I'll try to write a patch for that. Essentially we want to know if some kind of function type (or maybe just `FunctionProtoType`?) is involved in that declaration (without desugaring), either of a type declaration, or of the declared type of a non-type declaration. That's pretty much orthogonal to the kind. (Though it's of course incompatible with some kinds, such as `EnumKind` or `NamespaceKind`.) I'm wondering about global lambdas declarations. These should have class type, but also have parameters like a function. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D111264/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D111264 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
