ASDenysPetrov added a comment. @steakhal @NoQ wrote:
> I'm confident that there's a way to get it right, simply because the program > under analysis is type-correct. If it's the simplifier, let's fix the > simplifier. I agree with your main thought. But I also believe there definitely are thing to improve everywhere. And this one could wait until we find the root cause and correct it somewhere before. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115149/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115149 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
