alexfh added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20689#443266, @varjujan wrote:
> Yes, I did. The results from running the checker on LLVM are in the attached > file. Sadly, I could'nt find any real mistakes but as I wrote in the summary, > false positives can still indicate bad naming convention for some variables. > > F1991684: result.txt <http://reviews.llvm.org/F1991684> It looks like the check doesn't meet the quality bar, at least, in its current form. "Bad naming convention" is a very arguable thing and I'm not sure we can claim that the pattern detected by the check is somehow an indication of a bad naming convention. http://reviews.llvm.org/D20689 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
