kda updated this revision to Diff 399352.
kda added a comment.
Herald added subscribers: luke957, s.egerton, simoncook.

add param usage test


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D116701/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D116701

Files:
  clang/include/clang/Driver/SanitizerArgs.h
  clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
  clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
  clang/test/Driver/fsanitize-memory-param-retval.c
  compiler-rt/test/msan/noundef_analysis.cpp

Index: compiler-rt/test/msan/noundef_analysis.cpp
===================================================================
--- compiler-rt/test/msan/noundef_analysis.cpp
+++ compiler-rt/test/msan/noundef_analysis.cpp
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 // RUN: FileCheck %s --check-prefix=MISSED --allow-empty < %t.out
 // RUN: %clangxx_msan %s -Xclang -enable-noundef-analysis -mllvm -msan-eager-checks=1 -o %t && not %run %t >%t.out 2>&1
 // RUN: FileCheck %s < %t.out
+// RUN: %clangxx_msan %s -fsanitize-memory-param-retval -o %t && not %run %t >%t.out 2>&1
+// RUN: FileCheck %s < %t.out
 
 struct SimpleStruct {
   int md1;
Index: clang/test/Driver/fsanitize-memory-param-retval.c
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ clang/test/Driver/fsanitize-memory-param-retval.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+// RUN: %clang -target i386-gnu-linux %s -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-param-retval -c -### 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang -target x86_64-linux-gnu %s -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-param-retval -c -### 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu %s -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-param-retval -c -### 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang -target riscv32-linux-gnu %s -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-param-retval -c -### 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang -target riscv64-linux-gnu %s -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-param-retval -c -### 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
+// CHECK: "-fsanitize-memory-param-retval"
+
+// RUN: %clang -target aarch64-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only %s -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-param-retval -c -### 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=11 %s
+// 11: "-fsanitize-memory-param-retval"
+
+// RUN: not %clang -target x86_64-linux-gnu -fsyntax-only %s -fsanitize=memory -fsanitize-memory-param-retval=1 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=EXCESS %s
+// EXCESS: error: unknown argument: '-fsanitize-memory-param-retval=
Index: clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Driver/SanitizerArgs.cpp
@@ -641,10 +641,14 @@
         Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_fsanitize_memory_use_after_dtor,
                      options::OPT_fno_sanitize_memory_use_after_dtor,
                      MsanUseAfterDtor);
+    MsanParamRetval = Args.hasFlag(
+        options::OPT_fsanitize_memory_param_retval,
+        options::OPT_fno_sanitize_memory_param_retval, MsanParamRetval);
     NeedPIE |= !(TC.getTriple().isOSLinux() &&
                  TC.getTriple().getArch() == llvm::Triple::x86_64);
   } else {
     MsanUseAfterDtor = false;
+    MsanParamRetval = false;
   }
 
   if (AllAddedKinds & SanitizerKind::Thread) {
@@ -1096,6 +1100,9 @@
   if (MsanUseAfterDtor)
     CmdArgs.push_back("-fsanitize-memory-use-after-dtor");
 
+  if (MsanParamRetval)
+    CmdArgs.push_back("-fsanitize-memory-param-retval");
+
   // FIXME: Pass these parameters as function attributes, not as -llvm flags.
   if (!TsanMemoryAccess) {
     CmdArgs.push_back("-mllvm");
Index: clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
+++ clang/lib/CodeGen/BackendUtil.cpp
@@ -358,7 +358,8 @@
   int TrackOrigins = CGOpts.SanitizeMemoryTrackOrigins;
   bool Recover = CGOpts.SanitizeRecover.has(SanitizerKind::Memory);
   PM.add(createMemorySanitizerLegacyPassPass(
-      MemorySanitizerOptions{TrackOrigins, Recover, CompileKernel}));
+      MemorySanitizerOptions{TrackOrigins, Recover, CompileKernel,
+                             CGOpts.SanitizeMemoryParamRetval != 0}));
 
   // MemorySanitizer inserts complex instrumentation that mostly follows
   // the logic of the original code, but operates on "shadow" values.
@@ -1163,11 +1164,11 @@
         int TrackOrigins = CodeGenOpts.SanitizeMemoryTrackOrigins;
         bool Recover = CodeGenOpts.SanitizeRecover.has(Mask);
 
-        MPM.addPass(
-            ModuleMemorySanitizerPass({TrackOrigins, Recover, CompileKernel}));
+        MemorySanitizerOptions options(TrackOrigins, Recover, CompileKernel,
+                                       CodeGenOpts.SanitizeMemoryParamRetval);
+        MPM.addPass(ModuleMemorySanitizerPass(options));
         FunctionPassManager FPM;
-        FPM.addPass(
-            MemorySanitizerPass({TrackOrigins, Recover, CompileKernel}));
+        FPM.addPass(MemorySanitizerPass(options));
         if (Level != OptimizationLevel::O0) {
           // MemorySanitizer inserts complex instrumentation that mostly
           // follows the logic of the original code, but operates on
Index: clang/include/clang/Driver/SanitizerArgs.h
===================================================================
--- clang/include/clang/Driver/SanitizerArgs.h
+++ clang/include/clang/Driver/SanitizerArgs.h
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
   int CoverageFeatures = 0;
   int MsanTrackOrigins = 0;
   bool MsanUseAfterDtor = true;
+  bool MsanParamRetval = false;
   bool CfiCrossDso = false;
   bool CfiICallGeneralizePointers = false;
   bool CfiCanonicalJumpTables = false;
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to