christof added a comment.

In http://reviews.llvm.org/D21082#451393, @kubabrecka wrote:

> This doesn’t make sense to me, Clang is able to produce ASanified code even 
> when the compiler itself isn’t ASanified (that’s what LLVM_USE_SANITIZER 
> does).  Where exactly is this test failing?


Right. I was confused about the meaning of that feature. The test fails with:
clang-3.9: error: unsupported option '-fsanitize=address' for target 
'aarch64-arm-none-eabi’

The patch suggested by vitalybuka seems to work. So I suggest we go for that.


Repository:
  rL LLVM

http://reviews.llvm.org/D21082



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to