JamesReynolds added inline comments. ================ Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/IdentifierNamingCheck.h:89 @@ +88,3 @@ + + typedef std::pair<SourceLocation, std::string> NamingCheckId; + ---------------- I think I thought that this wouldn't get picked up by the specialization machinery - but you're right, a typedef works out fine! Maybe I was thinking of overloads...
http://reviews.llvm.org/D21020 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits