JamesReynolds added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang-tidy/readability/IdentifierNamingCheck.h:89
@@ +88,3 @@
+
+  typedef std::pair<SourceLocation, std::string> NamingCheckId;
+
----------------
I think I thought that this wouldn't get picked up by the specialization 
machinery - but you're right, a typedef works out fine! Maybe I was thinking of 
overloads...


http://reviews.llvm.org/D21020



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to