ABataev added a comment. In D70549#3256063 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D70549#3256063>, @JonChesterfield wrote:
> @ABataev @jhuber6 and I would like to change this to annotate variables with > whatever visibility the user asked for. > > Can you recall if the concern about premption here was for the deviceRTL, in > which case it can be comprehensively dealt with by internalizing the > deviceRTL symbols, or for user defined things in which case we want whatever > the linker flag -Bsymbolic maps onto as an IR construct. Hi, check the original PR, it has all required details. Maybe add a check that if the device is same as the host, then add hidden visibility (to avoid problems with the standard libs etc.), otherwise keep it as is? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D70549/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D70549 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
