LegalizeAdulthood added inline comments.

================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-const-correctness-templates.cpp:16
+  int value_int = 42;
+  // CHECK-MESSAGES:[[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: variable 'value_int' of type 'int' 
can be declared 'const'
+}
----------------
`CHECK-FIXES`?


================
Comment at: 
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-const-correctness-transform-pointer-as-values.cpp:12
+  // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:3: warning: variable 'p_local0' of type 
'double *' can be declared 'const'
+  // CHECK-FIXES: const
+}
----------------
Shouldn't this validate that the `const` was placed in the correct position?
e.g. `const double *` is a different meaning from `double *const`

Apply to all the other `CHECK-FIXES` as well


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D54943

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to