aaron.ballman added a comment.
In D117391#3301696 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D117391#3301696>, @kimgr wrote:
> @aaron.ballman Thanks for the valuable feedback!
>
>> Assuming that the `to_lvalue_ref(A{})` case should diagnose, then yes, I
>> agree, I think the `ret_a()` portion should as well.
>
> My primary focus is not to make sure Clang follows the standard closely for
> `consteval`, but rather to make sure it's self-consistent and doesn't provoke
> undefined behavior for `consteval` inputs.
Agreed, but if self-consistency takes us further away from standards
conformance, then we've got other problems to solve (and potentially need to
solve those first).
> So another way to think about it is that `to_lvalue_ref` and `ret_a` might
> both diagnose, or not, but absence of diagnostics should not be a result of
> misinterpreting the AST the way we do now.
Yup!
> I'm preparing a different patch to do the short-circuiting in
> `skipImplicitTemporary`, so we can more easily compare and contrast.
Thanks!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D117391/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D117391
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
