krzysz00 added a comment. Having checked with other folks more familiar with the context of our project, it looks like we might actually be fine using lld as a subprocess, since we'll always be sitting on top of a ROCm installation, which includes lld, and since "take this object file and wrap it into a shared library" is extremely unlikely to be broken by version changes.
That being said, I've also heard that when this code was initially landing (as part of mlir-rocm-runner, and before my time), the feedback was to use lld as a library and not a subprocess. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D119257/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D119257 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
