carlosgalvezp added a comment. Thanks a lot @tonic for your update and for the work done in the last months ! It's indeed very sad to hear the news. It's a pity that the work will probably be duplicated in many local forks with sub-optimal solutions instead of a centralized, high-quality, peer-reviewed open-source solution.
I'm not very familiar with the terms so I'm not sure I fully understand the reasons why we are advised not to proceed. Could you clarify/elaborate on what it means "the exact patent burden is not disclosed"? I was hoping that the written consent we got from AUTOSAR would be a strong basis to move forward. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112730/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112730 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
