erichkeane added a comment. In D110641#3319787 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110641#3319787>, @cor3ntin wrote:
> In D110641#3064200 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D110641#3064200>, @erichkeane > wrote: > >> Ping! Does anyone have any feedback on this? I'd really like to start >> getting us caught up on standards implementation, and this seems like it >> might be an easy win (unless someone on the list knows why it is just plain >> wrong/more complicated than I think!). > > Have we figured out what the intended semantic purposes of that requires > clause is supposed to be yet? Because I'm still very confused Nope, I have yet to be able to come up with a reproducer that would actually care about this in any of the compilers :/ CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D110641/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D110641 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
