lichray marked 3 inline comments as done. lichray added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/CharInfo.h:199-200 + return "\\t"; + case '\v': + return "\\v"; + } ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > We're also missing `\?` right? `?` does not seem to need `"escaping?"` ================ Comment at: clang/lib/AST/APValue.cpp:676-683 + if (Ty->isWideCharType()) + Out << 'L'; + else if (Ty->isChar8Type()) + Out << "u8"; + else if (Ty->isChar16Type()) + Out << 'u'; + else if (Ty->isChar32Type()) ---------------- aaron.ballman wrote: > Not quite the same thing, but do we have to worry about printing pascal > strings here? (e.g., do we need to do `"\pwhatever"`? This is in `APValue` where we lost the context of StringLiteral; nothing tells me that this array was created from a Pascal string literal. Unless you want to do some heuristics, like printing `"\pthis"` when seens an `unsigned char[6]` where the first element = 4 (last element = 0 is checked at the beginning). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D115031/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D115031 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits