vsapsai added a comment.

Sorry, I'm pretty ignorant in this area but based on

> The job construction is altered to build a C++20 header unit (rather than a 
> PCH file, as would be the case for other headers).

I want to clarify. The goal is to allow mixing PCH and PCM files, right? I 
haven't double checked and maybe that have changed already but I think `-x 
c++-header` started building .pcm instead of .pch with `-std=c++20`. That's 
where my confusion about mixing PCH and PCM comes from.



================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Driver/Types.def:66
 TYPE("c++-header",               CXXHeader,    PP_CXXHeader,    "hh",     
phases::Preprocess, phases::Precompile)
-TYPE("objective-c++-header-cpp-output", PP_ObjCXXHeader, INVALID, "mii",  
phases::Precompile)
+TYPE("c++-header-unit-cpp-output", PP_CXXHeaderUnit,INVALID,    "iih",    
phases::Precompile)
+TYPE("c++-header-unit-header",   CXXHUHeader,  PP_CXXHeaderUnit,"hh",     
phases::Preprocess, phases::Precompile)
----------------
Sorry, it's not really related to your change but do you have a rule where "ii" 
should go? It's just we have both "mii" and "iim" and I want to make sure it 
should be "iih" and not "hii". I haven't tried to find a pattern here myself, 
asking you first.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/Frontend/FrontendOptions.cpp:30-31
       .Case("cppm", Language::CXX)
+      .Case("iih", InputKind(Language::CXX).getPreprocessed())
       .Case("iim", InputKind(Language::CXX).getPreprocessed())
       .Case("cl", Language::OpenCL)
----------------
Given the other branches in this StringSwitch I would expect `.Cases("iih", 
"iim", InputKind(Language::CXX).getPreprocessed())`. Is there a reason not to 
do that (like differences between iih and iim) or is it accidental?


================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/cxx20-header-units-01.cpp:7
+
+// RUN: %clang++ -### -std=c++20 -xc++-header-unit-header 
%S/Inputs/header-unit-01.hh 2>&1 | \
+// RUN:   FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-ABS %s -DTDIR=%S/Inputs
----------------
What should happen in case of inconsistencies like `%clang++ -### -std=c++20 
-xc++-system-header %S/Inputs/header-unit-01.hh`? Or `-xc++-system-header 
foo.h`?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D121588/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D121588

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to