tbaeder added a comment. In D122885#3426070 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122885#3426070>, @urnathan wrote:
> Ah, I'd had a thinko about what 1703 was. that's superseded by > <strike>p1757</strike>wg21.link/p1857. That's what is needed. (your patch > makes more sense in the 1703 context) Ha, okay. Yes, that makes more sense. Both papers are linked in https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html. Sorry for the confusion, I'll have a look at 1857R3 instead. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122885/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122885 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
