erichkeane added a comment.

In D122983#3433685 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983#3433685>, @aaron.ballman 
wrote:

> In D122983#3430706 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983#3430706>, @erichkeane 
> wrote:
>
>> In D122983#3427518 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983#3427518>, @xbolva00 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Could you please check that https://github.com/llvm/llvm-test-suite is 
>>> buildable with your patch?
>>
>> Aaron wasn't able to get this working on his system, but I was.  I ended up 
>> collecting the following errors (though, if the build ended early and my 
>> workaround of adding the flag failed, i likely missed others):
>
> Thank you for the help with this, Erich!
>
>>   /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite-build/tools/timeit --summary 
>> MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeFiles/siod.dir/slibu.c.o.time 
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project2/build/bin/clang -DNDEBUG  -O3   -w 
>> -Werror=date-time -D__USE_MISC -D__USE_GNU -D__USE_SVID 
>> -D__USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED -D__USE_XOPEN -Dunix -MD -MT 
>> MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeFiles/siod.dir/slibu.c.o -MF 
>> MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeFiles/siod.dir/slibu.c.o.d -o 
>> MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeFiles/siod.dir/slibu.c.o   -c 
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/siod/slibu.c
>>   
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Applications/siod/slibu.c:1720:6:
>>  error: implicit declaration of function 'strptime' is invalid in C99 and 
>> later and unsupported in C2x [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>    if (strptime(get_c_string(str),get_c_string(fmt),&tm))
>>        ^
>>   1 error generated.
>>   
>>   
>>   
>>   
>>   /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite-build/tools/timeit --summary 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeFiles/plot2fig.dir/fontname.c.o.time
>>  /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project2/build/bin/clang -DNDEBUG  -O3   -w 
>> -Werror=date-time -MD -MT 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeFiles/plot2fig.dir/fontname.c.o
>>  -MF 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeFiles/plot2fig.dir/fontname.c.o.d
>>  -o 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeFiles/plot2fig.dir/fontname.c.o
>>    -c 
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/fontname.c
>>   
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/fontname.c:98:18:
>>  error: implicit declaration of function 're_comp' is invalid in C99 and 
>> later and unsupported in C2x [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>     res = (char *) re_comp (s);
>>                    ^
>>   
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/fontname.c:106:7:
>>  error: implicit declaration of function 're_exec' is invalid in C99 and 
>> later and unsupported in C2x [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>     if (re_exec("typewriter")
>>         ^
>>   2 errors generated.
>>   
>>   
>>   
>>   /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite-build/tools/timeit --summary 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeFiles/archie.dir/dirsend.c.o.time
>>  /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project2/build/bin/clang -DNDEBUG 
>> -I/iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client
>>  -O3   -w -Werror=date-time -MD -MT 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeFiles/archie.dir/dirsend.c.o
>>  -MF 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeFiles/archie.dir/dirsend.c.o.d
>>  -o 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeFiles/archie.dir/dirsend.c.o
>>    -c 
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/dirsend.c
>>   
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/dirsend.c:298:17:
>>  error: implicit declaration of function 'time' is invalid in C99 and later 
>> and unsupported in C2x [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>           srand(getpid()+time(0)); /* XXX: arg ok, but not right type. */
>>                          ^
>>   1 error generated.
>>   
>>   
>>   /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite-build/tools/timeit --summary 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeFiles/office-ispell.dir/term.c.o.time
>>  /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project2/build/bin/clang -DNDEBUG  -O3   -w 
>> -Werror=date-time -Dconst= -MD -MT 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeFiles/office-ispell.dir/term.c.o
>>  -MF 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeFiles/office-ispell.dir/term.c.o.d
>>  -o 
>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeFiles/office-ispell.dir/term.c.o
>>    -c 
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/term.c
>>   
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/term.c:519:9:
>>  error: implicit declaration of function 'wait' is invalid in C99 and later 
>> and unsupported in C2x [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>           while (wait (&termstat) != i)
>>                  ^
>>   1 error generated.
>>   
>>   
>>   /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite-build/tools/timeit --summary 
>> SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-cmpsi-1.dir/cmpsi-1.c.o.time
>>  /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project2/build/bin/clang -DNDEBUG  -O3   -w 
>> -Werror=date-time -w -MD -MT 
>> SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-cmpsi-1.dir/cmpsi-1.c.o
>>  -MF 
>> SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-cmpsi-1.dir/cmpsi-1.c.o.d
>>  -o 
>> SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeFiles/GCC-C-execute-cmpsi-1.dir/cmpsi-1.c.o
>>    -c 
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/cmpsi-1.c
>>   
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/cmpsi-1.c:4:5:
>>  error: implicit declaration of function 'dummy' is invalid in C99 and later 
>> and unsupported in C2x [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>       dummy ();
>>       ^
>>   
>> /iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/test-suite/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/cmpsi-1.c:15:5:
>>  error: implicit declaration of function 'dummy' is invalid in C99 and later 
>> and unsupported in C2x [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>>       dummy ();
>>       ^
>>   2 errors generated.
>>
>> With the following 'diff', I was able to get through these:
>>
>>   [ekeane1@scsel-clx-24 test-suite]$ git diff
>>   diff --git a/MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeLists.txt 
>> b/MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeLists.txt
>>   index a562f50d..6473e22e 100644
>>   --- a/MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeLists.txt
>>   +++ b/MultiSource/Applications/siod/CMakeLists.txt
>>   @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>   -list(APPEND CPPFLAGS -D__USE_MISC -D__USE_GNU -D__USE_SVID 
>> -D__USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED -D__USE_XOPEN -Dunix)
>>   +list(APPEND CPPFLAGS -D__USE_MISC -D__USE_GNU -D__USE_SVID 
>> -D__USE_XOPEN_EXTENDED -D__USE_XOPEN -Dunix 
>> -Wno-implicit-function-declaration)
>>    list(APPEND LDFLAGS -lm)
>>    set(RUN_OPTIONS -v1 test.scm)
>>    llvm_multisource(siod)
>>   diff --git a/MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeLists.txt 
>> b/MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeLists.txt
>>   index 13920af8..a102311b 100644
>>   --- a/MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeLists.txt
>>   +++ b/MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/CMakeLists.txt
>>   @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
>>   -list(APPEND CPPFLAGS -Dconst=)
>>   +list(APPEND CPPFLAGS  -Wno-implicit-function-declaration -Dconst=)
>>    list(APPEND LDFLAGS -lm)
>>    set(RUN_OPTIONS -a -d americanmed+ < large.txt)
>>    llvm_multisource(office-ispell)
>>   diff --git 
>> a/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeLists.txt 
>> b/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeLists.txt
>>   index bf3b189b..f939f2a3 100644
>>   --- a/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeLists.txt
>>   +++ b/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/CMakeLists.txt
>>   @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
>>    include(CheckFunctionExists)
>>   +list(APPEND CPPFLAGS -Wno-implicit-function-declaration)
>>    check_function_exists(re_comp HAVE_RE_COMP)
>>   
>>    if(HAVE_RE_COMP)
>>   diff --git a/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeLists.txt 
>> b/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeLists.txt
>>   index 06090ee0..c7019582 100644
>>   --- a/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeLists.txt
>>   +++ b/MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/CMakeLists.txt
>>   @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
>>    include(CheckFunctionExists)
>>    check_function_exists(re_comp HAVE_RE_COMP)
>>   +list(APPEND CPPFLAGS -Wno-implicit-function-declaration)
>>    if(HAVE_RE_COMP)
>>      list(APPEND LDFLAGS -lm)
>>      llvm_multisource(plot2fig)
>>   diff --git 
>> a/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeLists.txt 
>> b/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeLists.txt
>>   index 4daf07e7..d95836af 100644
>>   --- a/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeLists.txt
>>   +++ b/SingleSource/Regression/C/gcc-c-torture/execute/CMakeLists.txt
>>   @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>    add_subdirectory(ieee)
>>   
>>    # GCC C Torture Suite is conventionally run without warnings
>>   -list(APPEND CFLAGS "-w")
>>   +list(APPEND CFLAGS  -Wno-implicit-function-declaration "-w")
>>   
>>    set(TestsToSkip)
>>   
>>   [ekeane1@scsel-clx-24 test-suite]$
>>
>> I note that we likely cannot add those until the flag is added to 'clang', 
>> so either these changes need to happen at the same time, or we need to add 
>> the clang-warning-flag WITHOUT this patch's changes, THEN add these changes 
>> to the cmake lists, THEN add the rest of this patch.  (Or some variety of 
>> other things).
>
> The `-Wimplicit-function-declaration` already exists today, so I believe we 
> can land the changes you have above to the test suite already today 
> independent of this patch. Would you be interested in being nerd-sniped into 
> doing that @erichkeane since you can actually run the tests? (I'm happy to 
> support you in the work however I can, of course.)

*GRUMBLE GRUMBLE GRUMBLE*.
Sure, I can get on that in the next day or two.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D122983

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to