void added a comment.

In D121556#3444221 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556#3444221>, @MaskRay wrote:

> In D121556#3444131 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556#3444131>, @void wrote:
>
>> In D121556#3444021 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556#3444021>, @MaskRay 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> 7aa8c38a9e190aea14116028c38b1d9f54cbb0b3 
>>> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rG7aa8c38a9e190aea14116028c38b1d9f54cbb0b3> still 
>>> uses `std::shuffle`, not incorporating the `llvm::shuffle` fixes I did.
>>
>> You said it was still failing after the std::shuffle to llvm::shuffle change.
>
> By saying it still failed, I meant there were other Windows vs non-Windows 
> differences, not that std::shuffle=>llvm::shuffle was an unintended change.

So does it work or not? If I change it to `llvm::shuffle`, will the tests fail 
or will they pass regardless of the platform?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D121556

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to