awarzynski added a comment. @h-vetinari & @rouson, thanks for the encouragement!
In D122008#3450214 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122008#3450214>, @h-vetinari wrote: > I'd be more than a little surprised that there's no way to do this. Have you > tried CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS > <https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/variable/CMAKE_LANG_FLAGS.html>? AFAICT, > the environment variables should be respected. I completely forgot about `CMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS`! Indeed, it worked :) I really appreciate you doing all that digging and the suggestion itself! Yes, sounds like we can return to Option 2, which is fantastic news and great team effort! I will post an updated version of this patch shortly. My suggestion for the new flag: `-flang-experimental-exec`. Hopefully not too long or to vague and informative enough. WDYT? In D122008#3450346 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122008#3450346>, @rouson wrote: > I don't know the time required to complete the remaining tasks, but the > following issues show 216 of 235 tasks completed with 2 in progress: Thanks for that executive summary @rouson, it does look encouraging :) Unfortunately, upstreaming is effectively on hold ATM. People are not too keen to commit to any dates (understandable), but we (Arm) will continue working towards the LLVM 15 target (fingers crossed!). **Summary** AFAICT, Option 2 addresses all the issues raised here and (more importantly) unblocks a few new streams of development. IMO, it's a very good compromise and we should go ahead with it. I will leave this here for a few more days in case people have more comments. Thank you, -Andrzej Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122008/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122008 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
