kees added a comment.
In D123958#3459205 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D123958#3459205>, @aaron.ballman
wrote:
> I had assumed that any structure not marked for randomization would not be
> randomized. Based on that, I don't think inner structure objects (anonymous
> or otherwise) should automatically randomize their fields. WDYT?
Correct, inner structs should be evaluated without looking at the state of the
outer randomization.
struct mixed {
int a;
float b;
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct ordered {
int foo;
char bar[8];
};
struct composite {
int one;
struct mixed two;
struct ordered three;
struct {
unsigned long am;
double ordered;
};
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
- Each of the member's relative positions of `struct composite` should be
randomized: one, two, three, anon struct.
- The members of `two` should be randomized.
- The members of `three` should //not// be randomized.
- The members of the anon struct should //not// be randomized.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123958/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D123958
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
