sgatev accepted this revision. sgatev added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/unittests/Analysis/FlowSensitive/TypeErasedDataflowAnalysisTest.cpp:884 +// +// Note: currently, abstract function calls are uninterpreted, so the test +// exercises this case. If and when we change that, this test will not add to ---------------- What does "abstract" mean here? Perhaps "arbitrary"? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D123858/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D123858 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
