BertalanD added a comment. In D124736#3485128 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124736#3485128>, @rjmccall wrote:
> It should probably be the ABI alignment in all cases; I think the preferred > alignment is just supposed to be used to opportunistically over-align things > like e.g. local variables, which doesn't seem relevant for the ABI code > involving a call to `operator new`. Right, that makes sense. I'll update this patch tomorrow. Thanks for the review :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124736/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124736 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
