efriedma added a comment. I don't want to change with the distinction between FunctionProtoType and FunctionNoProtoType; that would involve auditing a bunch of code we don't really want to mess with.
FunctionProtoType and FunctionNoProtoType don't have any member variables at the moment, though. The only difference is that FunctionProtoType has TrailingObjects, and FunctionNoProtoType doesn't. It should be fine to just require the same TrailingObjects for FunctionNoProtoType. So FunctionProtoType and FunctionNoProtoType would have the same memory layout. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124998/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124998 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
