serge-sans-paille added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp:1609 struct X { int a[2]; }; constexpr int *n = (X){1, 2}.a; // expected-warning {{C99}} expected-warning {{temporary}} // expected-error@-1 {{constant expression}} ---------------- @efriedma this is the test you asked for. it's already implemented, and my patch doesn't change its behavior, which matches the GCC behavior. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D124038/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D124038 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits