martong added a comment. In D125400#3516164 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125400#3516164>, @balazske wrote:
> @martong Do you mean that a "describe" function is needed for the return > value constraint of the function and for the errno constraint type? Then a > note tag can contain what the function is assumed to return on success and > what is allowed (or not) to do with `errno`. For example: "Assuming that > 'mkdir' is successful, it returns zero in this case and value of 'errno' is > unspecified after the call". Yes, that sounds good. We have the virtual `describe` function in the base constraint class that could be used to explain what values we expect. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125400/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125400 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
