LegalizeAdulthood added a comment. In D125771#3525252 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D125771#3525252>, @njames93 wrote:
> Tbh the whole testing infrastructure for clang-tidy is a mess. When I have > wanted to verify fixes and diagnostics for header files, I find manually > invoking clang-tidy is better than using the check_clang_tidy script. > I don't have the time right now, but a verify mode like with clang is > something that we should move to in the future. I had a change <https://reviews.llvm.org/D17482>, literally years ago at this point, that provided support for verifying header files, but it got bogged down in review nits and never landed. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D125771/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D125771 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
