rnk added a comment.

I am reminded of the perennial problem of "optional" protobuf fields that, when 
omitted, will cause production crashes.

Do you think it would be less disruptive to synthesize a name? I believe the 
string lives in a string pool, so naming all string literals `<stringliteral>` 
seems like it could be acceptable.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D126224/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D126224

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to