kees added a comment. In D126864#3582360 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864#3582360>, @nickdesaulniers wrote:
> If the GCC developers split this into two distinct flags, should we land > something we're just going to have to turn around and modify to match the new > flags/semantics they've created? I'm cautious about waiting on theoretical design choices. They appear to agree that a "fully strict" mode should exist, and that's what -fstrict-flex-arrays here gets us. I'd rather get this into Clang now so I can start working through all the new cases it finds instead of waiting for bikeshedding to end. If Clang needs to rename the option in a few months, I think that's okay. But I'll leave it up to @serge-sans-paille CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D126864 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
