steakhal added a comment. Thanks for updating the summary.
I'm not too confident around diagnostics though. I'm going to piggyback on @scott.linder's comments. I think they are on the point. nit: I'm not sure if `size_t` is a thing in c++, `std::size_t` is though. ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Basic/Diagnostic.cpp:815 for (char c : S) { - if (llvm::sys::locale::isPrint(c) || c == '\t') { + if (llvm::sys::locale::isPrint(c) || c == '\t' || c == '\n') { OutStr.push_back(c); ---------------- Should we account for `'\r'`-s as well? I'm not sure how it works though ================ Comment at: clang/lib/Frontend/TextDiagnosticPrinter.cpp:119-135 + // If the diagnostic message is formatted into multiple lines, split the + // first line and feed it into printDiagnosticOptions so that we print the + // options only on the first line instead of the last line. + SmallString<100> InitStr; + size_t NewlinePos = OutStr.find_first_of('\n'); + if (NewlinePos != StringRef::npos) { + for (size_t I = 0; I != NewlinePos; ++I) ---------------- scott.linder wrote: > Nit: I'd remove the `if`s and just use the behavior of `slice(npos, ...)` > returning the empty string > > I also would reword "split the first line and feed it into > printDiagnosticOptions", as it could be interpreted as meaning the first line > is an input to `printDiagnosticOptions` Use braces for both branches or no braces at all. [[ https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#don-t-use-braces-on-simple-single-statement-bodies-of-if-else-loop-statements | LLVM CodingStandards ]] Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127923/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127923 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits