steplong added a comment.
It looks like misc-new-delete-overloads.cpp is failing on line 20:
1 // RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s misc-new-delete-overloads %t
2
3 typedef decltype(sizeof(int)) size_t;
4
5 struct S {
6 // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:9: warning: declaration of 'operator
new' has no matching declaration of 'operator delete' at the same scope
[misc-new-delete-overloads]
7 void *operator new(size_t size) noexcept;
8 // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:9: warning: declaration of 'operator
new[]' has no matching declaration of 'operator delete[]' at the same scope
9 void *operator new[](size_t size) noexcept;
10 };
11
12 // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:7: warning: declaration of 'operator new'
has no matching declaration of 'operator delete' at the same scope
13 void *operator new(size_t size) noexcept(false);
14
15 struct T {
16 // Sized deallocations are not enabled by default, and so this
new/delete pair
17 // does not match. However, we expect only one warning, for the new,
because
18 // the operator delete is a placement delete and we do not warn on
mismatching
19 // placement operations.
20 // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE+1]]:9: warning: declaration of 'operator
new' has no matching declaration of 'operator delete' at the same scope
21 void *operator new(size_t size) noexcept;
22 void operator delete(void *ptr, size_t) noexcept; // ok only if sized
deallocation is enabled
23 };
On Line 16, it says sized deallocations are not enabled by default, but this
patch turns it on by default for MSVC.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127641/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D127641
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
