martong added a comment. In D127874#3628112 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D127874#3628112>, @martong wrote:
>> I don't think any of the issues mentioned in this patch relates to strongly >> connected components, thus I don't think I can answer to this question. > > In your example above, repeated here: > > #6(entry) #2(goto a;) > | | ^ > #5(goto end;) | \ > | #4(goto b;) | > #1(end:) | | > | #3(goto c;) | > #0(exit) \________/ > > [#2, #4, #3] is a strongly connected (and unreachable) component of the CFG, > isn't it? Upsz, I've made a mistake. I wanted to write **connected components** without the **strongly** adverb. Please remove the **strongly** from all my comments above. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D127874/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D127874 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
