ChuanqiXu accepted this revision.
ChuanqiXu added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

In D129530#3644091 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129530#3644091>, @ychen wrote:

> In D129530#3644074 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129530#3644074>, @ChuanqiXu 
> wrote:
>
>> This looks good to me basically. I would love to see an example to test the 
>> two coro.save wouldn't be merged.
>
> Yep, `hoist-skip-token.ll` is testing this.

Oh, sorry. I didn't notice that. The current version should be fine.

Personally, I would like to move the test to `Transforms/Coroutine` and add a 
new test that the two `llvm.coro.suspend` are the same but they couldn't be 
merged. This is not required.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D129530/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D129530

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to