jhuber6 added a comment. In D128090#3649579 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128090#3649579>, @tra wrote:
> In D128090#3649235 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D128090#3649235>, @jhuber6 wrote: > >> Interesting, may be worthwhile to query that if it exists, though AMD does >> this with `amdgpu-arch` which has led to problems for me in the past. But >> even if it could be wrong it will still spit out an architecture that would >> run on at least one local card rather than zero. > > We do have existing precedent of `-march=native`, so it may make sense to > introduce `--offload-arch=native`, though it may be a bit too ambiguous, > considering that there may be more than one likely choice -- multiple GPUs, > possibly a mix from different vendors. Perhaps we would need something more > specific, like `--offload-arch=native-nvidia`. That's an interesting idea, we could put that functionality in OpenMP using this method as well. -Xopenmp-target=nvptx64 -march=native For CUDA / HIP we could also potentially just make users specify which toolchain the native applies to somewhat like `-Xopenmp-target`. Might be a more general solution than attaching it to the architecture string. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D128090/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D128090 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
