tra added a comment. In D129536#3666860 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D129536#3666860>, @jdoerfert wrote:
> The assertion is arguably not great but doesn't really matter, does it? How > would I detect if they are supported? The latest revision of the patch is fine in this regard. My comment pointing to compiler crash reproducer was only intended to address the "For me this passes fine" part. The only remaining thing is the manual `__CUDA_ARCH__` redifinition which looks suspect to me. Is there any reason not to use `-target-cpu sm_30` instead? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D129536/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D129536 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
